|
Post by lashrash on Dec 18, 2007 14:32:05 GMT -5
[/b]
• Executive orders and Royal Decrees cannot circumvent one another. If a decree or order is made that circumvents another, the subsequent order or decree shall be null and void.
• The Minister of State or the Monarch may enact, subsido velitatio, which is the settlement of disputes where either the Monarch or the Minister of State disagrees with an order given by the other.
• Subsido velitatio will be a hearing before the senate, in private, where each party will make a statement. Following statements, the senate will take no more than seven days and no less than two days to discuss the matter and vote on the outcome.
• There will be two rulings that can be made. Substantiated, which will be in favor of the enacting party and the decree or order will be overturned. Invalidated, where the enactment will be considered null and void and the order or decree in question will be upheld.
• For the duration of subsido velitatio, all orders or decrees will be placed on hold, at which time they are valid but not in effect until a ruling is made.
• If either party issues an order after the fact, circumventing the other, the first offense will be a warning from the Supreme Court; all subsequent violations will be subject to the fullest extent of the law as seen fit by the Supreme Court, in which case the punishment may range from fines to temporary banning. [/quote]
This is now open for discussion
|
|
|
Post by akoni on Dec 18, 2007 14:47:06 GMT -5
From what I gathered from this act, I like it. However, I would like to request this be put into layman's terms for reassurance. Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by lashrash on Dec 18, 2007 16:57:18 GMT -5
It basically says that the Minister of State and the Monarch can challenge an order or decree issued by the other party.
It also explains that the senate will take the statements of both parties and make the final decision.
Finally it says that either part has a single oversight it which they are warned not to do it again, however all actions afterwards do have consequences.
|
|
|
Post by Kilikopela on Jan 3, 2008 5:25:46 GMT -5
I motion for a vote.
|
|