|
|
Post by lashrash on Dec 2, 2007 23:40:49 GMT -5
I would like to put up for discussion where we have to actually have to have a majority of the Parliament Delegates votes in order for anything to actually pass due to the lack of votes in the last four polls. |
|
|
|
Post by Kilikopela on Dec 3, 2007 3:11:13 GMT -5
I think it is a great idea and if there is no further discussion, I move for a vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by lashrash on Dec 3, 2007 8:27:08 GMT -5
A vote may not happen for 48 hours.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rodhlann Pierce on Dec 3, 2007 19:03:44 GMT -5
True, but someone can make a a motion ahead of time inn order to get things going faster.
|
|
|
|
Post by lashrash on Dec 19, 2007 10:42:22 GMT -5
I however am extending this topic for 1 week. This seems a bit trite, and what you are suggesting is that we have to have 3 delegates vote on anything to make it pass.
That is not how it works, the majority of the votes, cast within the time alloted, are the votes that count. Many of us miss the votes because we are not active enough, if we were on daily I could agree with this, but until then it seems that we are going to be spinning our wheels a lot.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rodhlann Pierce on Dec 19, 2007 19:52:41 GMT -5
The obvious solution to that is to extend the time allowed to vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by lashrash on Dec 20, 2007 1:17:53 GMT -5
We give two days for each vote, I intend to leave it the way it is, it works there is no real reason to change it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rodhlann Pierce on Dec 21, 2007 23:26:10 GMT -5
It works? Are you serious? One person voted in the last four votes! How does that show that it works? It doesn't! It shows that it doesn't work!
|
|
|
|
Post by Rodhlann Pierce on Dec 21, 2007 23:26:46 GMT -5
I second Kilikopela's motion.
|
|
|
|
Post by lashrash on Dec 31, 2007 23:52:26 GMT -5
This will now be taken to the voting booth.
|
|
